Soapy Edradour - was Cadenhead Edradour 19 yr
Ralph Katzenell
ralphoosh at 012.NET.IL
Mon Dec 4 16:12:06 CET 2006
I think some of the best of the regular Edradours were produced by Signatory in the pre-ownership days, the ones in the all blue tin tube.
I've had the 1st batch of the post-Signatory purchase, and two of the 2nd batch. Awful. Undrinkable. I keep a sample just to see how people react. I haven't bought since, but have tried out some when the company was paying. Still awful.
There's something not nice going on at Edradour.
(Any collector want Bottle No. 1 of the Sig?)
Uncle (soon to be gran'dad) Ralph
----- Original Message -----
From: Mike Davis <mldavis2 at SBCGLOBAL.NET>
Date: Monday, December 4, 2006 4:40 pm
Subject: Re: Cadenhead Edradour 19 yr
> Well, yes, maybe soapy, but to me the overwhelming and
> objectionable taste
> is the perfume (typical of some soaps perhaps that I don't
> purchase) that
> stays on the palate for hours. I truly cannot believe that anyone at
> Cadenhead ever tasted this stuff and put their label on it.
> Either that or
> their taste buds are burned off and it isn't objectionable to
> their "master
> tasters."
>
> On the other hand, I have a bottle of Edradour 10 (OB) that is
> quite nice.
>
> Mike Davis
> mldavis2 AT sbcglobal DOT net
>
> -------------- https://www.lists.uni-karlsruhe.de/ --------------
>
-------------- https://www.lists.uni-karlsruhe.de/ --------------
More information about the MM-MALTS-L
mailing list