Blind tastings

[cdaniels]

Hi Lex

So you finally weakened and started to score whiskies?  How well did your
benchmarking exercise work?  Did you notice the “deathseat” effect?

>From my perspective of doing blind tastings over 12 years 6-8 is as many as
I feel comfortable with and where I believe my palate will hold up.

I do acknowledge though that the last whisky in a flight of 8 or 10 may be
treated more leniently than the first one.

Therefore it’s always good to nose/taste the same whiskies in a different
order, but you need a friend/partner/spouse to pour the second flight so you
don’t know which is which.

Cheers from downunder
Craig 

-----Original Message-----
From: MALTS-L at RZ.UNI-KARLSRUHE.DE [mailto:MALTS-L at RZ.UNI-KARLSRUHE.DE] On
Behalf Of Kraaijeveld A.R.
Sent: Tuesday, 12 September 2006 9:22 PM
To: MALTS-L at LISTS.UNI-KARLSRUHE.DE
Subject: Re: Blind tastings

Not really an answer to all your questions, but let me just tell you how I
did the blind tastings/scorings for the recent WM Independent's Bottler's
Challenge.

First of all, no tasting notes were necessary, only scoring the whisky on a
scale from 1 to 10, with halves being allowed. I always drink a good glass
of water after each whisky to try and cleanse my palate as much as possible.
I tasted/scored each sample twice. First I made flights of between 5 and 10
whiskies (so no more than 5-10 whiskies on an evening). Flights were
determined by region and age categories. When I'd gone through all of the
whiskies and given them a score, I went through them a second time, but this
time arranging them in flights determined by the score they got first time
round. So that meant all whiskies scoring 6 together, then all whiskies
scoring 6.5, then all 7s, etc. This way I could fine-tune my scores, making
sure that a whisky I scored, say, 8 in the very first flight was of equal
'quality' to a whisky I scored 8 in the last flight. 

Hope that makes sense ....

Lex




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Fly, you greatest fool
Why can't you say what they want you to
Why can't you do what they taught you
And show what they wanted of you      
       
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Dr Alex R Kraaijeveld
School of Biological Sciences
University of Southampton
Bassett Crescent East
Southampton
SO16 7PX
tel: (+44)-(0)23-80593436
fax: (+44)-(0)23-80594459
http://www.sbs.soton.ac.uk/staff/ark/ark.php

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


-----Original Message-----
From: MALTS-L at RZ.UNI-KARLSRUHE.DE [mailto:MALTS-L at RZ.UNI-KARLSRUHE.DE] On
Behalf Of Mike Davis
Sent: 12 September 2006 12:40
To: MALTS-L at LISTS.UNI-KARLSRUHE.DE
Subject: Re: Blind tastings

Ah, yes, blind tastings.  That brings up some questions from this novice.

As a wine buff for a few decades, I know blind wine tastings well.  However
whisky tends to be a bit different.  I have not been to an "official" blind
whisky tasting, only my own setups.

Having read with some interest the escapades of groups like the Malt
Maniacs, I am amazed at the sheer number of drams tasted in a session.  With
wine, it is quite acceptable to use unflavored crackers to clear the palate
between samples.  I don't find that to be as effective with whisky.

Whisky also tends to numb the nose and palate after a few drams, whether or
not you swallow.  How can you effectively and accurately evaluate the nose
and palate of the 10th dram?

Personally, I have to live with a whisky for a few sessions, which means
(for me) buying the bottle.  The palate needs to be free of recent food
contamination.  I also need some time to allow the nose to develop,
experiment with drops of water (which can be a very fascinating and
revealing process), determine the appropriate dilution, or dilution steps to
reveal the layers of complexity, makes notes and then return to the bottle
on a later date and sample under my "optimum" conditions with no time
restraints, free from conflicting odors such as perfume or scented deodorant
of others in the room.

I find additional complexity during different sessions, and often change my
personal rating after a few drams.

Perhaps what I'm asking is for experienced session tasters to defend their
evaluation techniques against the inevitable palate changes that take place
during blind tastings with a large number of samples.

Mike Davis
mldavis2 AT sbcglobal DOT net
http://www.pbase.com/mldavis2/ 

--------------  https://www.lists.uni-karlsruhe.de/  --------------

--------------  https://www.lists.uni-karlsruhe.de/  --------------


-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.2/442 - Release Date: 8/09/2006

--------------  https://www.lists.uni-karlsruhe.de/  --------------