Malts-L
Magnus Herou
magnus.herou at DATAPHONE.NET
Wed Apr 25 10:12:15 CEST 2007
As a lurker since the dawn of MALTS-L, I too think that MM sounds like
the best solution.
I prefer having the posts arriving in my inbox rather than having to
access a website.
Preserving the archive seems to me like a top priority.
Unfortunately I don't have any practical suggestions to solve this, even
though I work for an ISP.
How big is the archive?
Regards
Magnus Herou
From: MALTS-L at RZ.UNI-KARLSRUHE.DE [mailto:MALTS-L at RZ.UNI-KARLSRUHE.DE]
On Behalf Of Ulf Buxrud
Sent: den 16 april 2007 17:36
To: MALTS-L at LISTS.UNI-KARLSRUHE.DE
Subject: Re: Malts-L
100% for it
Ulf
List member since the dawn of MALTS-L
Certified Malt Maniac
Hi all
One option for hosting the active list could be Malt Maniacs. A solution
like that would bring the most knowledgeable mailing list on malt whisky
together with one of the best web-sites on malt whisky (but I admit I'm
biased on this!). Given the standing of MM both within the industry and
among whisky enthusiasts worldwide, having Malts-L under a MM umbrella
could be just what we need to boost activity on the list.
Apart from technical details, how do people think about Malts-L hosted
by MM?
Slainte, Lex
-------------- https://www.lists.uni-karlsruhe.de/ --------------
-------------- https://www.lists.uni-karlsruhe.de/ --------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grsnet.net/pipermail/mm-malts-l/attachments/20070425/ab5785da/attachment-0002.html
More information about the MM-MALTS-L
mailing list